Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 23;32:101436. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101436

Table 2.

Summary of the quality ratings for the eligible studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for case-control studies.

First author [reference] Selection Comparability Exposure Total points Ratinga
AbdulWahab [69] 2 1 3 6 High
Ambroszkiewicz [60] 3 2 2 7 High
Antus [74] 3 0 1 4 Moderate
Aris [68] 2 1 3 6 High
Back [42] 1 1 2 4 Moderate
Bernardi [39] 2 1 2 5 Moderate
Best [71] 1 1 3 5 Moderate
Cobanoglu [66] 2 2 3 7 High
Collins [75] 3 0 3 6 High
Dominguez [64] 1 1 1 3 Moderate
Durieu [43] 0 0 2 2 Low
Eichler [144] 2 0 1 3 Moderate
Hahn [48] 2 2 3 7 High
Hubbard [55] 2 0 1 3 Moderate
Hung [89] 3 0 1 4 Moderate
Jacob [49] 2 0 2 4 Moderate
James [38] 0 0 2 2 Low
Kearns [46] 1 1 2 4 Moderate
Koller [145] 1 0 2 3 Moderate
Koller [146] 0 0 2 2 Low
Koller [147] 1 0 2 3 Moderate
Konstantinidis [139] 1 1 3 5 Moderate
Lagrange-Puget [7] 2 0 2 4 Moderate
Lands [73] 1 0 2 3 Moderate
Lee [45] 2 0 1 3 Moderate
Madarasi [61] 1 1 2 4 Moderate
Mangione [51] 0 1 3 4 Moderate
McGrath [54] 3 2 3 8 High
Mocchegiani [47] 1 1 3 5 Moderate
Nicolaidou [44] 2 0 3 5 Moderate
Olveira [58] 1 2 3 6 High
Olveira [52] 0 1 3 4 Moderate
Oudshoorn [63] 0 1 3 4 Moderate
Percival [70] 3 1 3 7 High
Reiter [65] 3 2 3 8 High
Rovner [67] 3 0 3 6 High
Sadowska-Bartosz [53] 1 0 3 4 Moderate
Sadowska-Woda [72] 0 1 3 4 Moderate
Schupp [57] 2 2 3 7 High
Sidlova [88] 2 0 3 5 Moderate
Stead [50] 2 1 2 5 Moderate
Tauber [143] 0 1 2 3 Moderate
Tirouvanziam [40] 1 0 3 4 Moderate
Turowski [140] 2 0 3 5 Moderate
Vaisman [62] 0 1 3 4 Moderate
Van Biervliet [142] 2 0 3 5 Moderate
Winklhofer-Roob [56] 2 0 2 4 Moderate
Wood [41] 4 2 3 9 High
Yadav [59] 2 1 3 6 High
a

Studies scoring 0–2 were considered low quality, studies scoring 3–5 were considered moderate quality and studies scoring 6–8 points were considered high quality.