Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 21;18(6):1320–1323. doi: 10.1111/jth.14871

Table 1.

Main clinical characteristics and C‐trough DOAC levels in the cohort of patients

Number Age Sex Clinical indication DOAC Dose mg/d Antiviral drugs C‐trough (ng/mL) Pre‐hospitalization C‐trough (ng/mL) In‐hospital Δ %
1 86 M NVAF Dabigatran 110 × 2 Lopinavir/Ritonavir 54 221 +309.3
2 89 F NVAF Apixaban 2.5 × 2 Lopinavir/Ritonavir 71 420 +491.5
3 74 M NVAF Apixaban 5 × 2 Darunavir/Ritonavir 112 185 +65.2
4 69 F NVAF Apixaban 5 × 2 Lopinavir/Ritonavir 85 326 +283.5
5 77 M VTE Apixaban 5 × 2 Darunavir/Ritonavir 78 142 +82
6 73 M NVAF Apixaban 5 × 2 Lopinavir/Ritonavir 92 163 +77.2
7 80 F NVAF Edoxaban 60 Lopinavir/Ritonavir 102 473 +363.7
8 89 M NVAF Edoxaban 30 Darunavir/Ritonavir 25 112 +348
9 85 M NVAF Edoxaban 30 Darunavir/Ritonavir 11 71 +545.5
10 82 M NVAF Rivaroxaban 15 Lopinavir/Ritonavir 12 143 +1091.7
11 77 M NVAF Rivaroxaban 20 Lopinavir/Ritonavir 16 505 +3056.2
12 79 F NVAF Rivaroxaban 15 Lopinavir/Ritonavir 13 99 +661.5