Skip to main content
. 2020 May 4;68(6):E14–E18. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16500

Table 2.

Respondent Characteristics and Perception about COVID‐19 Pandemica

Perception variable Safety Preparedness Screeningb Recommendation Panic
Age
≤65 (n = 18) 5.0 (4.0, 5.0) 4.4 (0.6) 4.3 (0.8) 4.5 (0.6) 4.7 (0.6)
>65 (n = 33) 5.0 (3.0, 5.0) 4.2 (1.1) 4.0 (1.1) 4.1 (1.0) 4.3 (0.9)
Gender
Male (n = 27) 4.4 (1.1) 4.4 (0.9) 4.1 (1.1) 4.2 (1.0) 4.2 (0.9)
Female (n = 24) 4.1 (1.2) 4.1 (0.9) 4.1 (0.9) 4.3 (0.9) 4.8 (0.7)e
Education
≤High school (n = 31) 4.3 (1.2) 4.2 (0.9) 4.1 (1.0) 4.2 (0.9) 4.5 (0.8)
>High school (n = 20) 4.3 (1.2) 4.3 (1.0) 4.1 (1.1) 4.3 (1.0) 4.4 (0.9)
Participant/caregiver
Participant (n = 31) 4.3 (1.2) 4.3 (0.9) 4.0 (1.1) 4.2 (0.9) 4.4 (0.8)
Caregiver (n = 20) 4.2 (1.2) 4.3 (1.0) 4.3 (1.0) 4.4 (1.0) 4.7 (0.8)
Phone visit preferencec
Yes (n = 23) 3.7 (1.4) 3.7 (1.1) 3.8 (1.1) 3.7 (1.1) 4.8 (0.4)
No (n = 23) 4.7 (0.6)f 4.7 (0.5)f 4.3 (1.0) 4.6 (0.6)f 4.1 (1.0)f
Information sourced
Family member (n = 24) 3.9 (1.4) 4.0 (1.2) 4.1 (1.1) 4.0 (1.1) 4.5 (0.8)
TV (n = 16) 4.8 (0.5)f 4.6 (0.6)e 4.2 (1.0) 4.6 (0.7) 4.6 (0.7)
a

The summary statistics are given as mean (standard deviation), except for safety with respect to age where median is reported along with 25th and 75th percentiles. In that instance, a Wilcoxon rank‐sum test was utilized.

b

There was one missing value for this variable.

c

Only “Yes” and “No” responses were analyzed. There were four “N/A" responses and one missing value.

d

Only “Family Member” and “TV” responses were analyzed. There were nine responses other than “Family Member” and “TV” and two missing values.

e

P value <.05.

f

P value <.01.