Table 2.
Validation of the sample clean-up procedure of ATMP, EDTMP and DTPMP
| Phosphonate | Condition | LOD mg L−1 | LLOQ mg L−1 | PSD - | rel. PSD% | Slope- | Recovery% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATMP (UPW) | Without CER | 1.281 | 1.901 | 0.150 | 2.498 | 0.3590 ± 0.0120 | - |
| CER | 5.214 | 5.845 | 0.221 | 2.606 | 0.3473 ± 0.0162 | 96.7 ± 4.51 | |
| CER 100 | 3.119 | 4.479 | 0.145 | 1.936 | 0.3854 ± 0.0153 | > 100 | |
| CER 1000 | 1.404 | 2.796 | 0.083 | 1.179 | 0.3969 ± 0.0109 | > 100 | |
| ATMP (TW) | CER | 0.586 | 1.873 | 0.111 | 1.818 | 0.1877 ± 0.0113 | 52.5 ± 3.14 |
| CER 100 | 0.559 | 2.427 | 0.109 | 1.809 | 0.2109 ± 0.0100 | 58.8 ± 2.78 | |
| CER 1000 | 1.367 | 1.447 | 0.142 | 2.029 | 0.2142 ± 0.0111 | 59.7 ± 3.09 | |
| EDTMP (UPW) | No CER | 6.045 | 11.615 | 0.196 | 0.981 | 0.4341 ± 0.0126 | - |
| CER | 14.348 | 15.286 | 1.067 | 5.335 | 0.4230 ± 0.0098 | 97.5 ± 2.26 | |
| CER 100 | 11.827 | 13.880 | 0.663 | 3.157 | 0.2329 ± 0.0076 | 53.6 ± 1.76 | |
| CER 1000 | 5.706 | 8.093 | 0.416 | 2.082 | 0.2177 ± 0.0165 | 50.2 ± 3.81 | |
| EDTMP (TW) | CER | 5.870 | 8.741 | 0.253 | 1.267 | 0.3301 ± 0.0146 | 76.1 ± 3.36 |
| CER 100 | 8.623 | 12.340 | 0.198 | 1.040 | 0.4926 ± 0.0164 | > 100 | |
| CER 1000 | 6.598 | 12.787 | 0.437 | 2.300 | 0.4280 ± 0.0167 | 98.6 ± 3.86 | |
| DTPMP (UPW) | No CER | 9.913 | 12.703 | 0.252 | 1.677 | 0.4700 ± 0.0123 | - |
| CER | 10.195 | 14.242 | 0.160 | 1.144 | 0.2495 ± 0.0079 | 53.1 ± 1.68 | |
| CER 100 | 8.690 | 10.595 | 0.123 | 0.818 | 0.1876 ± 0.0099 | 39.9 ± 2.10 | |
| CER 1000 | 9.067 | 10.349 | 0.143 | 0.952 | 0.3896 ± 0.0161 | 82.9 ± 3.42 | |
| DTPMP (TW) | CER | 8.372 | 11.719 | 0.202 | 1.348 | 0.3411 ± 0.0119 | 72.6 ± 2.53 |
| CER 100 | 8.872 | 12.630 | 0.190 | 1.266 | 0.3176 ± 0.0165 | 67.6 ± 3.50 | |
| CER 1000 | 8.951 | 13.554 | 0.185 | 1.233 | 0.2626 ± 0.0113 | 55.9 ± 2.41 |