Table 3.
Recommended individual sample clean-up condition.
| Treatment | AMPA | IDMP | HEDP | ATMP | EDTMP | DTPMP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UPW | without CER | + + + | + + + | + + + | + + + | + + + | + + |
| with CER | + + | + + + | + + | + + | + | + + | |
| CER 100 | + + | + | + + | + + | + + + | + + | |
| CER 1000 | + + + | + | + + + | + + + | + + + | + + + | |
| TW | without CER | + | - | - | - | - | - |
| with CER | + | + + + | + + | + + | + + | + + + | |
| CER 100 | + + | + + | + | + + + | + + + | + + | |
| CER 1000 | + + + | + + | + + + | + + | + + | + |
Criteria of Table S3:
+++ lowest LLOQ, lowest LOD, lowest PSD, highest recovery value
++ low LLOQ, low LOD, low PSD, high or middle recovery value
+ relatively low LLOQ and/or LOQ, low PSD, fairly recovery value
- no peak detection possible