Skip to main content
. 2020 May 26;29:e130. doi: 10.1017/S2045796020000414

Table 2.

Quantitative acceptability and feasibility measures

Variable – n (%)a Group PM+ EUC
Acceptability of intervention n = 4 n = 4
Competency in common factors (%, IQR)
Pre-training in psychosocial foundations 23% (11–44%) 27% (11–61%)
Post-training in psychosocial foundations 76% (61–89%) 84% (72–94%)
Fidelity of PM+ facilitators
To 75% or more items in each of 5 group sessions 4 (100%)
To 75% or more items in more than 3 group sessions 4 (100%)
Group PM+ participation n = 61 n = 60
Number of sessions attended
0 2 (3%)
1 3 (5%)
2 0 (0%)
3 10 (16.4%)
4 14 (23.0%)
5 32 (52.5%)
Outcome measurements n = 61 n = 60
All items of outcome measured at baselineb
PHQ-9 61 (100%) 60 (100%)
WHODAS 61 (100%) 60 (100%)
GHQ 61 (100%) 60 (100%)
PCL-5 61 (100%) 60 (100%)
RTC 61 (100%) 60 (100%)
All items of outcome measured at endlineb,c
PHQ-9 58 (100%) 60 (100%)
WHODAS 58 (100%) 60 (100%)
GHQ 58 (100%) 60 (100%)
PCL-5 58 (100%) 60 (100%)
RTC 58 (100%) 60 (100%)
All key outcomes measuredb
Baseline 61 (100%) 60 (100%)
Endlinec 58 (100%) 60 (100%)
Time (days) between: [median (25th, 75th percentile)]
Screening and baseline interview 10 (5, 32) 9 (6, 14)
Baseline interview and endline interviewc 42 (36, 47) 48 (43, 52)
Adverse events
Any adverse eventd 4 2
Serious adverse event 0 1e
a

Unless otherwise noted.

b

Of five key measures: PHQ-9, WHODAS, GHQ, PCL-5 and RTC. Note, at baseline, WHODAS and GHQ were measured at screening and the remaining three measures at the baseline interview. Additionally, there were no missing items for any of the five measures at either time point.

c

Of those who were not lost to follow-up (n = 58 in intervention and n = 60 in control).

d

All six were suicidal thoughts.

e

Death unrelated to the study.