Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 30;22:100338. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100338

Table 2.

Analyses of the relative and absolute changes in the primary and secondary outcomes for all subjects who completed the study.

Within group comparison
Low Load (N = 36) High load (N = 33) Difference between groups P ANCOVA
Primary outcome
 Relative change
  Body weight (%) −0.31 (−0.70 to 0.08) −1.68 (−2.09 to −1.27)*** −1.37 (−1.96 to −0.79) 1.5E-05
Secondary outcomes
 Relative change
  Fat mass (%) −0.79 (−2.46 to 0.88) −4.82 (−6.57 to −3.08)*** −4.04 (−6.53 to −1.55) 1.9E-03
  Fat free mass (%) −0.04 (−1.32 to 1.24) 0.39 (−0.95 to 1.73) 0.43 (−1.47 to 2.34) 0.65
  Fat percent (%) −0.48 (−2.17 to 1.20) −3.18 (−4.95 to −1.42)*** −2.70 (−5.21 to −0.19) 0.035
 Absolute change
  Body weight (kg) −0.30 (−0.66 to 0.05) −1.61 (−1.98 to −1.24)*** −1.31 (−1.84 to −0.78) 6.3E-06
  Fat mass (kg) −0.22 (−0.82 to 0.37) −1.73 (−2.36 to −1.10)*** −1.51 (−2.40 to −0.61) 1.3E-03
  Fat free mass (kg) −0.08 (−0.74 to 0.58) 0.12 (−0.57 to 0.81) 0.20 (−0.79 to 1.18) 0.69
  Fat percent (%) −0.16 (−0.83 to 0.51) −1.25 (−1.95 to −0.54)*** −1.09 (−2.09 to −0.08) 0.034

The primary outcome was the relative change after 3 weeks in body weight. Results are presented as least square means with 95% confidence intervals for all randomized subjects with body weight available both at baseline and at 3 weeks treated with light weight vest (Low load; n = 36) or heavy weight vest (High load, n = 33). The between group p-values (High load vs Low load) given within the table are calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) adjusted for age, sex, baseline BMI, Vest exposure (h) and standing % with vest. *** = p<0.001 for within group comparison (Three weeks vs baseline) using Wilcoxon signed rank-sum test.