Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 17;17(5):403–411. doi: 10.30773/pi.2019.0173

Table 6.

Mediator analysis of immersive tendency, childhood ADHD, POG, and PIU

Outcome Detecting steps in mediation model B SE B β R2
POG Step 1 (path c)
 Outcome: POG
 Predictor: IT 0.437 0.085 0.592*** 0.351
Step 2 (path a)
 Outcome: childhood ADHD
 Predictor: IT 0.715 0.125 0.633*** 0.401
Step 3 (paths b and c’)
 Outcome: POG
 Mediator: childhood ADHD (path b) 0.363 0.083 0.557***
 Predictor: IT (path c’) 0.177 0.094 0.24 0.537
PIU (IAT) Step 1 (path c)
 Outcome: POG
 Predictor: IT 0.531 0.087 0.659*** 0.434
Step 2 (path a)
 Outcome: childhood ADHD
 Predictor: IT 0.715 0.125 0.633*** 0.401
Step 3 (paths b and c’)
 Outcome: POG
 Mediator: childhood ADHD (path b) 0.271 0.092 0.380**
 Predictor: IT (path c’) 0.337 0.104 0.418** 0.521
**

p<0.01,

***

p<0.001.

IT: immersive tendency, POG: problematic online gaming, PIU: problematic Internet use, IAT: Internet Addiction Test, ADHD: attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder