Skip to main content
. 2020 May 21;18(3):142–147. doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2020.05.003

Table 2.

Baseline and follow-up evaluation results in sTC and tTC group.

sTC Group (n = 14) tTC Group (n = 14)
Baseline (mean ± SD) Follow-up (mean ± SD) p value Baseline (mean ± SD) Follow-up (mean ± SD) p value
Functional Balance
BBS 50.3 ± 2.1 54.0 ± 1.1 <0.001∗ 49.2 ± 4.5 51.1 ± 4.7 0.001∗
TUG 8.7 ± 0.7 6.9 ± 0.9 0.001# 9.0 ± 1.8 8.4 ± 1.6 0.115
FRT 28.7 ± 4.2 32.5 ± 4.1 <0.001∗ 24.3 ± 5.6 24.8 ± 3.8 0.766
Muscle Strength
RH F 17.7 ± 6.1 22.2 ± 7.5 0.001∗ 16.6 ± 3.9 18.5 ± 3.1 0.032∗
LH F 17.1 ± 6.2 21.7 ± 7.7 0.001∗ 15.4 ± 4.3 17.7 ± 3.4 0.033∗
RH E 17.1 ± 5.1 20.8 ± 7.4 0.007∗ 16.4 ± 2.9 18.2 ± 3.8 0.083
LH E 17.8 ± 5.8 21.5 ± 8.6 0.001# 16.2 ± 2.9 17.1 ± 3.4 0.310
RH Ab 12.9 ± 3.4 16.8 ± 5.9 0.003∗ 15.7 ± 3.4 16.8 ± 2.6 0.276
LH Ab 12.5 ± 3.2 15.7 ± 5.5 0.002∗ 12.3 ± 2.0 15.8 ± 2.9 0.001∗
RH Ad 11.6 ± 3.2 14.3 ± 4.8 0.005∗ 11.1 ± 2.1 12.9 ± 2.9 0.050
LH Ad 10.7 ± 3.2 13.9 ± 4.7 0.007∗ 12.1 ± 2.8 13.4 ± 2.6 0.121
RK F 11.7 ± 3.7 12.7 ± 4.0 0.010∗ 13.3 ± 2.6 14.1 ± 2.5 0.323
LK F 11.0 ± 3.7 13.1 ± 4.9 0.009∗ 12.8 ± 2.6 13.8 ± 2.9 0.226
RK E 19.1 ± 4.2 21.4 ± 5.8 0.019∗ 18.2 ± 3.5 18.9 ± 4.6 0.418
LK E 18.1 ± 4.0 21.2 ± 5.6 <0.001∗ 16.9 ± 2.4 17.8 ± 4.3 0.424
RA Df 13.3 ± 3.9 15.4 ± 5.0 0.003∗ 11.1 ± 2.3 13.9 ± 2.7 0.001#
LA Df 12.5 ± 3.7 15.1 ± 4.7 <0.001∗ 11.4 ± 2.5 14.0 ± 2.9 0.002∗
RA Pf 18.3 ± 4.1 22.8 ± 8.3 0.015∗ 17.6 ± 2.3 19.3 ± 3.6 0.128
LA Pf 18.6 ± 3.9 21.7 ± 6.7 0.010∗ 16.7 ± 2.8 17.3 ± 4.0 0.445

# nonparametric statistics; ∗p < 0.05; sTC = selected Tai-Chi; tTC = traditional Tai-Chi; SD = standard deviation; BBS = Berg Balance Scale; TUG = Timed Up and Go test; FRT = Functional Reach Test; RH = righ hip; F = flexor; LH = left hip; E = extensor; Ab = abductor; Ad = adductor; RK = right knee; LK = left knee; RA = right ankle; Df = dorsi-flexor; LA = left ankle; Pf = plantar-flexor.