Skip to main content
. 2020 May 21;18(3):142–147. doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2020.05.003

Table 3.

Baseline and follow-up evaluation results between sTC and tTC groups.

Baseline Follow-up
sTC group (mean ± SD) tTC group (mean ± SD) p value sTC group (mean ± SD) tTC group (mean ± SD) p value
Functional Balance
BBS 50.3 ± 2.1 49.2 ± 4.5 0.444 54.0 ± 1.1 51.1 ± 4.7 0.044∗
TUG 8.7 ± 0.7 9.0 ± 1.8 0.890# 6.9 ± 0.9 8.4 ± 1.6 0.015#
FRT 28.7 ± 4.2 24.3 ± 5.6 0.034∗ 32.5 ± 4.1 24.8 ± 3.8 <0.001∗
Muscle Strength
RH F 17.7 ± 6.1 16.6 ± 3.9 0.594 22.2 ± 7.5 18.5 ± 3.1 0.119
LH F 17.1 ± 6.2 15.4 ± 4.3 0.413 21.7 ± 7.7 17.7 ± 3.4 0.094
RH E 17.1 ± 5.1 16.4 ± 2.9 0.673 20.8 ± 7.4 18.2 ± 3.8 0.265
LH E 17.8 ± 5.8 16.2 ± 2.9 0.890# 21.5 ± 8.6 17.1 ± 3.4 0.301#
RH Ab 12.9 ± 3.4 15.7 ± 3.4 0.046∗ 16.8 ± 5.9 16.8 ± 2.6 0.990
LH Ab 12.5 ± 3.2 12.3 ± 2.0 0.841 15.7 ± 5.5 15.8 ± 2.9 0.936
RH Ad 11.6 ± 3.2 11.1 ± 2.1 0.645 14.3 ± 4.8 12.9 ± 2.9 0.372
LH Ad 10.7 ± 3.2 12.1 ± 2.8 0.278 13.9 ± 4.7 13.4 ± 2.6 0.759
RK F 11.7 ± 3.7 13.3 ± 2.6 0.207 12.7 ± 4.0 14.1 ± 2.5 0.320
LK F 11.0 ± 3.7 12.8 ± 2.6 0.151 13.1 ± 4.9 13.8 ± 2.9 0.672
RK E 19.1 ± 4.2 18.2 ± 3.5 0.551 21.4 ± 5.8 18.9 ± 4.6 0.234
LK E 18.1 ± 4.0 16.9 ± 2.4 0.382 21.2 ± 5.6 17.8 ± 4.3 0.087
RA Df 13.3 ± 3.9 11.1 ± 2.3 0.089# 15.4 ± 5.0 13.9 ± 2.7 0.476#
LA Df 12.5 ± 3.7 11.4 ± 2.5 0.416 15.1 ± 4.7 14.0 ± 2.9 0.458
RA Pf 18.3 ± 4.1 17.6 ± 2.3 0.587 22.8 ± 8.3 19.3 ± 3.6 0.173
LA Pf 18.6 ± 3.9 16.7 ± 2.8 0.160 21.7 ± 6.7 17.3 ± 4.0 0.054

# nonparametric statistics; ∗p < 0.05; sTC = selected Tai-Chi; tTC = traditional Tai-Chi; SD = standard deviation; BBS = Berg Balance Scale; TUG = Timed Up and Go test; FRT = Functional Reach Test; RH = righ hip; F = flexor; LH = left hip; E = extensor; Ab = abductor; Ad = adductor; RK = right knee; LK = left knee; RA = right ankle; Df = dorsi-flexor; LA = left ankle; Pf = plantar-flexor.