Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 2;20:134. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01053-3

Table 3.

Comparison of sex, BMI, MMT, DSE and the best model for predicting a difficult laryngoscopy

Metric Sex (Male) BMI ≥ 25 MMT ≥ III DSE > 2.36 Best Model
Sensitivity (95% CI) 0.614 (0.548–0.679) 0.386 (0.321–0.452) 0.750 (0.692–0.808) 0.818 (0.766–0.870) 0.909 (0.870–0.948)
Specificity (95% CI) 0.611(0.545–0.677) 0.731 (0.671–0.790) 0.713 (0.652–0.774) 0.856 (0.809–0.904) 0.904 (0.864–0.944)
PPV (95% CI) 0.294 (0.232–0.355) 0.274 (0.214–0.334) 0.407 (0.341–0.474) 0.600 (0.534–0.666) 0.714 (0.653–0.775)
NPV (95% CI) 0.857 (0.810–0.904) 0.819 (0.767–0.871) 0.915 (0.878–0.953) 0.947 (0.917–0.977) 0.974 (0.953–0.996)
Kappa 0.160 (0.043–0.278) 0.819 (0.767–0.871) 0.353 (0.230–0.476) 0.595 (0.463–0.727) 0.739 (0.606–0.873)
Youden 0.224 0.117 0.463 0.6745 0.8132
OR (95% CI) 2.492 (1.258–4.937) 1.707 (0.849–3.431) 7.437 (3.471–15.936) 26.813 (11.102–64.756)

Abbreviations: BMI Body mass index, MMT Modified mallampatia test, DSE Distance from skin to epiglottis, NPV Negative predictive value, PPV Positive predictive value, OR Odds ratio, CI Confidence interval