Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 23;32(1):1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2019.10.002

Table 2.

Strabismus surgery in thyroid eye disease (TED)

Study Sample size Follow-up Preoperative deviation Muscle procedure Outcomes and consideration
Dal Canto et al.50
Retrospective
24 Average 5.9 months ET: 28 PD
HT: 25
ET: 21, HT: 21
MR recession + IR recession
IR recession ± IR recession
SR recession
IR recession + LR recession
MR + IR + SR recession
Excellent outcome (no diplopia without prism): 87.5%
Reoperation rate: 8%
Relaxed muscle positioning technique
Lyu et al.51
Retrospective
43 Median 14.2 months Median
30 PD
MR recession Success rate: 86%
Under-correction: 14%
Adjustable sutures (n=35)
Jellema et al.60
Retrospective
102 6-12 months 8.7±4.9 degrees
18.1±7 degrees
Unilateral MR recession
BMR recession
Success rate 77%
Additional surgery 23%
Surgical dose-response 1 degree/mm
Weldy and Kerr61
Retrospective
11 2 months 17.8 PD (8-30) BLR resection
Unilateral LR resection
Success rate 91%
Adjustable sutures
Amount of resection 4-12 mm
Kim et al.62 Retrospective 9 3 months Distance: 23.1±10.3
(12-30) PD
Near: 14.9±12.3 PD
LR resection
5.1±1.6 (3-8) mm
Success rate 78%
Fixed sutures
Greninger et al.63
Retrospective
47 Average
19.5 months
30-80 PD (ET before MR recession)
12-50 PD (residual ET after BMR recession)
MR recession + LR resection
LR recession
All patients were free of diplopia
Peragallo et al.64
Retrospective
Group A (n=13)
 Group B (n=13)
Control (n=14)
- 17±9.2 PD
21.3±7.5 PD
11.2±1.3 PD
IR recession (unilateral) Over-correction
A: 23%
B: 14%
Control: 16%
Group A: Adjustable sutures in TED patients
Group B: Fixed or semi-adjustable sutures in the cases with TED
Control group: Adjustable sutures in patient with other forms of strabismus
Nicholson et al.65
Retrospective
58 Average 12.1 - MR recession
MR + IR recession
LR + IR recession
IR recession
Excellent outcome in 83% of the patients
Relaxed muscle positioning technique
Large horizontal deviation was associated with an increased chance for reoperation
Cruz and Davitt66
Retrospective
8 18 months - IR recession Seven patients were successfully aligned
One case was under-corrected
Adjustable sutures
Barker et al.67
Retrospective
42 12 months 21.1 PD IR recession
SR recession
IR recession + SR recession
71% were free of diplopia
Adjustable sutures
19% over-correction
Kushner68
Retrospective
57 (14 cases had TED) 13.6±5.9 - IR recession
MR recession
None of them demonstrated muscle slippage
Semi-adjustable sutures
Cestari et al.69
Retrospective
Group 1 (n=9)
Group 2 (n=9)
4/3 months
4/8 months
HOT: 24.2±7.2
HOT: 24.4±6.6
ET: 15.2±4.6
XT: 29.0±29.5
IR recession
IR + SR recession
IR ± SR + LR recession
SR + IR + MR recession
Group 1: Success rate 89%
Group 2: Success rate 67%
Postoperative vertical drift toward HT:
 Group 1: 1.2 PD
 Group 2: 6.8 PD
P=0.048
Kerr70 Retrospective Group 1 n=34 (patient with TED)
Group 2 n=30 (no TED)
Group 3 n=13 (TED)
2 months Non-absorbable cases: 20±11.65 PD
Absorbable cases: 20±13.8 PD
IR recession
Unilateral IR recession
MR recession
Absorbable suture and TED were associated with postoperative over-correction
Non-absorbable suture was strongly correlated with the absence of over-correction
Tacea et al.71
Retrospective
n=8 54±41 (range, 21-125 months) Distance: 15.8±8.8
Near: 14.2±8.4
SR resection
IR resection
IR + SR resection
Success rate 62.5%
All the patients underwent prior maximal vertical rectus muscle recession. 37.5% of the patients required further surgery

TED: Thyroid eye disease, ET: Esotropia, PD: Prism diopter, HT: Hypertropia, MR: Medial rectus, BMR: Bilateral medial rectus, HOT: Hypotropia, XT: Exotropia, IR: Inferior rectus, SR: Superior rectus, LR: Lateral rectus, BLR: Bilateral lateral rectus