Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 2;10:8942. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65645-2

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Cone metrics were analyzed as a function of axial length at eccentricities of 0.2 mm (blue squares), 0.3 mm (orange circles), and 0.5 mm (gray triangles) for 29 subjects. Lines show linear regressions for those data that possessed a statistically significant relationship. (A) Linear cone density (cones/mm2) significantly decreased with increasing axial length only at an eccentricity of 0.2 mm (linear cone density [x 1,000 cones/mm2] = −5.2913 × (axial length, in mm) +180.08, P = 0.001). (B) Angular cone density (cones/deg2) was not significantly related to axial length at any examined eccentricity. (C) Farthest neighbor distance significantly increased in eyes with longer axial lengths only at an eccentricity of 0.2 mm (farthest neighbor distance = 0.312 × (axial length, in mm) − 1.2785, P = 0.002).