Li 2000.
| Study characteristics | ||
| Methods | Active‐controlled, parallel‐group, double‐blind randomised controlled trial with a third group receiving sulthiame openly No historical baseline period, six‐month treatment phase |
|
| Participants | Participants with generalised tonic‐clonic seizures who had experienced a seizure within three to six months of the study start date Number of participants randomly assigned: 146 Number of participants in each group: intervention group: 32 (18 [56%] males and 14 [44%] females); control group: 32 (17 [53%] males and 15 [47%] females); open group: 82 (57 [70%] males and 25 [30%] females) Mean (SD) age, years: intervention group: 29.53 (15.09); control group: 34.91 (15.12): open group: 27.69 (16.76) |
|
| Interventions | Sulthiame (100 to 200 mg/d) versus phenytoin (100 mg TDS) | |
| Outcomes | Adverse effects Treatment response defined as
Laboratory tests prestudy and poststudy
|
|
| Notes | This paper provides no information regarding participants withdrawing from the trial after randomisation. All participants were subsequently included in the analysis | |
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | High risk | Method of randomisation not stated. High proportion of males versus females in open group |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | High risk | Method of allocation concealment not stated |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Method of blinding not stated |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Method of blinding not stated |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | No data provided on participants withdrawing from treatment |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | No data on proportion of participants with a reduction in seizure frequency of 50% or greater, proportion of participants seizure free at 12 months or quality of life scale scores. Data provided on adverse effects include blinded and unblinded participants. It is unclear whether data provided on adverse effects is on number of events or number of participants experiencing an adverse effect. |
| Other bias | High risk | Incomplete information on inclusion and exclusion criteria and on combination of treatment and open groups when analysis of adverse effects was performed; separate data for the intervention group alone not provided |