Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar-Apr;25(2):52–60. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.25.2.052-060.oar

Table 5. Comparison of mean difference between study groups in the zone of inhibition diameter, using Tukey-HSD test.

Groups ZnO 1% TiO2 0.5% AgO 1% TiO2 1% CuO 1% Control HA 0.50% AgO 0.5% HA 1% ZnO 0.50% CuO 0.50%
CuO 0.5% 1.5 1.5 -1.625 1.5 -0.5 1.5 1.5 -1 1.5 1.5 --
p-valor <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.237 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
ZnO 0.5% 0 0 -3.125 0 -2 0 0 2.5 0 -- 1.5
p-valor 1 1 <0.001 1 <0.001 1 1 <0.001 1 <0.001
HA 1% 0 0 -3.125 0 -2 0 0 -2.5 -- 0 1.5
p-valor 1 1 <0.001 1 <0.001 1 1 <0.001 1 <0.001
AgO 0.5% 2.5 2.5 -0.625 2.5 0.5 2.5 2.5 -- -2.5 2.5 -1
p-valor <0.001 <0.001 0.049 <0.001 0.237 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
HA 0.5% 0 0 1.2503 0 -2 0 -- 2.5 0 0 1.5
p-valor <0.001 1 <0.001 1 <0.001 1 <0.001 1 1 <0.001
Control 0 0 -3.125 0 -2 -- 0 2.5 0 0 1.5
p-valor 1 1 <0.001 1 <0.001 1 <0.001 1 1 <0.001
CuO 1% 2 2 -1.125 2 -- -2 -2 0.5 -2 -2 -0.5
p-valor <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.237 <0.001 <0.001 0.237
TiO2 1% 0 0 -3.125 -- 2 0 0 2.5 0 0 1.5
p-valor 1 1 <0.001 <0.001 1 1 <0.001 1 1 <0.001
AgO 1% 3.125 3.125 -- -3.125 -1.125 -3.125 1.2503 -0.625 -3.125 -3.125 -1.625
p-valor <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.049 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
TiO2 0.5% 0 -- 3.125 0 2 0 0 2.5 0 0 1.5
p-valor 1 <0.001 1 <0.001 1 1 <0.001 1 1 <0.001
ZnO 1% -- 0 3.125 0 2 0 0 2.5 0 0 1.5
p-valor 1 <0.001 1 <0.001 1 1 <0.001 1 1 <0.001