Skip to main content
. 2020 May 2;12(5):e7934. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7934

Table 2. Comparison of the microhardness at enamel and dentin with different materials using ANOVA test.

 a,b Same lower-case alphabets indicate a significant difference (one-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test p<0.05).

GIC - glass ionomer cement; NSF - nano-silver fluoride; SD - standard deviation; ANOVA - analysis of variance

Group n Mean hardness at enamel (SD) Mean hardness at dentin (SD)
GIC 10 230.20 (32.97)a 67.66 (11.38)
Composite 10 223.20 (17.96)b 58.86 (7.14)
NSF + GIC 10 287.00 (34.964)ab 79.34 (16.59)
NSF + composite 10 246.20 (17.82) 70.04 (6.83)
Total 40 246.65 (35.57) 68.97 (12.72)