Table 1.
Critical appraisal worksheet summary for clinical trial
Author, Year, Country | Randomized assignment of subjects | Similar groups at baseline | Equal treatment of groups | Intention to treat analysis | Double blinded study design | Examiners calibrated | Large effect size | Precision of estimate | External validity | Extent to which criteria were met |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fung et al.[16]; 2018, Hong Kong | Yes | Yes | Yes | Not mentioned | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 8 out of 9 criteria met |
Yee et al.[17]; 2009, Nepal | Done, method of random allocation not described | Yes | No | No | Not mentioned | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | 4 out of 9 criteria met |
Chu et al.[7]; 2002, China | Not mentioned | Yes | No | No | No. Single blind | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 5 out of 9 criteria met |
Llodra et al.[18]; 2005, Cuba | Done, method of random allocation not described | Yes | Yes | No | No. Single blind | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 6 out of 9 criteria met |