Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 26;9(3):1497–1509. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1014_19

Table 3.

Ranking of barriers to improve coverage of WIFS identified by stakeholders, Rishikesh, India (2018-19)

Ideas (after clarification phase) Priorities (scores from each participant) Sum of scores (for each idea) Relative importance (%)* Frequency of voting (for each idea) Ranked priority (via scores and frequency)

1 2 3 4 5 6
Non availability of tablet 5 5 5 5 5 5 30 33.33 6 #1
Irregularity in IFA consumption report from school 4 4 4 3 4 4 23 25.56 6 #2
Lack of information to teacher 2 2 2 1 3 3 13 14.44 6 #3
Trained teacher being transferred out 1 3 3 2 0 0 9 10.00 4 #4
CRC not permanent 3 1 1 3 0 0 8 8.89 4 #5
No workshop for principal and teachers 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 4.44 2
Hesitancy of student to take tablet 0 0 0 0 2 2 4 4.44 2

*Relative importance = [(score for item) ÷ (maximum points for group i.e., participant number×15 points) × 100]. WIFS - weekly iron-folic acid supplementation; IFA - iron-folic acid; CRC – cluster resource coordinator