Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 2;44(8):2451–2457. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05627-7

Table 2.

Recommendations for strengthening vulnerabilities exposed by the COVID-19 pandemic stress-test

Domain Recommendation Rationale
Infrastructure

First-time screening telemedicine consultations

Pre-pandemic stockpiling of blood products

Exemptions to lockdown restrictions and COVID-19 testing for blood donors

Public blood donation campaign, mobilisation via technology, drone-based deliveries

Provide transport for donors [10]

Reducing blood donation intervals [10]

Reduced access to first-level facilities

Surgical speciality hospitals fulfilling safe surgery criteria repurposed for pandemic-related services

Risk of depleted available blood donation pool due to lockdown orders

Workforce

Provide sufficient PPE to ensure safety of surgical workforce

Hazard pay and life assurance cover for dependants

Use non-monetary remuneration for health-care workers who are chronically underpaid

‘Intangible alternative rewards’, e.g. recognition-of-service awards and promotions [22]

Provide mental health services to SAOs and HCWs via tele-remote services

Prioritise HCWs for testing

Risk of reduced specialist SAO providers with narrower distribution due to illness and burn-out

Reduction in SAO graduates due to stalled training programs

Reduced retention of HCWs

Reduced density of nurses and ancillary staff

Service delivery

No blanket elective cancellations

Risk-based approach to elective cancellations

Use size of waiting list and demand elasticity to determine surgical volume

Use stepwise approach for cancellations that depends on number of cases in the country and expected backlog

Pre-operative testing for all patients to identify those at increased risk of poor post-operative outcome

Reduction in annual surgical volumes

Increased peri-operative mortality with concurrent COVID infection

Risk of incremental mortality and increased DALYs lost due to cancellation may outweigh risk of specific elective procedures in LMICs

Need to ensure continuity of surgical care and training of surgical workforce

Financing

Implement ring-fencing/prepayment mechanisms for funds specific to surgical conditions, e.g. “road accident fund” that cannot be redirected

Manufacture low-cost PPE locally

Use additive manufacturing techniques

Reduce cost of surgical care and PPE using robust supply chain management principles [42]

Separation of emergency and routine surgical supply chain to minimise disruptions to non-pandemic care [48]

Risk of redirection of domestic budget away from surgical care

Risk of foreign ICOs withdrawing funding

Risk of reduced independence and development of local surgical infrastructure globally

Risk of catastrophic health expenditure from surgical disease

Information management

Zero-rating telemedicine apps by carriers

Deployment of government sponsored network technology

Use of non-traditional information technology for training, patient information and collaboration

Cost of broadband makes telemedicine prohibitively expensive

Telemedicine is still a nascent technology with low uptake

Pandemic offers an opportunity to accelerate adoption

Governance Resume work on NSOAP planning, reschedule planning meetings using video conferencing technology Risk of stalled NSOAP planning