Skip to main content
. 2020 May 9;12127:353–367. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-49435-3_22

Table 4.

Comparison of alternative models for each variable

Variance explained Model fit
RInline graphic AIC BIC
Model 1 Model 2 Model 1 Model 2 Model 1 Model 2
Correctness 63.8% 65.7% −59.617 −56.313 −49.847 −46.638
Efficiency 57.9% 58.6% −412.078 −398.820 −402.261 −398.097
Ease of use 4.8% 14.1% 232.593 232.281 241.917 244.004
Usefulness 10.9% 13.7% 218.295 217.452 228.113 227.176
Intention to use 4.8% 6.2% 270.298 268.847 280.115 278.570