Table 4.
Comparison on POS tags (NLP libraries vs. Manual benchmark)
Feature request | ReadMe file | JavaDoc | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Identical | All | ACC | Identical | All | ACC | Identical | All | ACC | |
NLTK | 2165 | 2545 | 85% | 2807 | 3238 | 87% | 3701 | 4256 | 87% |
spaCy | 2241 | 2580 | 88% | 2851 | 3335 | 87% | 3732 | 4348 | 87% |
Stanford CoreNLP | 2123 | 2529 | 84% | 2717 | 3243 | 84% | 3549 | 4245 | 84% |
OpenNLP | 2197 | 2535 | 87% | 2842 | 3218 | 89% | 3665 | 4221 | 87% |
Combined method | 2308 | 2528 | 91% | 2931 | 3227 | 91% | 3824 | 4252 | 90% |
Overall Improvement | 3% | 2% | 3% |