Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 6.
Published in final edited form as: J Neural Eng. 2019 Aug 6;16(5):056009. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab3189

Table 4. Mean FWHM across subjects for model 1 and 2.

FWHM was extracted from task 1 and separately for the four ROIs: All – mean HFB power across significant channels; M1 – mean HFB power across significant channels over M1; CS – mean HFB power across significant channels over the central sulcus; S1 – mean HFB power across significant channels over S1; std – standard deviation over subjects.

FWHM
model 1
(mean ± std, in s)
FWHM
model 2
(mean ± std, in s)

All 0.17 ± 0.18 0.26 ± 0.06
M1 0.23 ± 0.23 0.26 ± 0.12
CS 0.12 ± 0.17 0.23 ± 0.07
S1 0.15 ± 0.22 0.23 ± 0.07