Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 13;111(6):1203–1213. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa019

TABLE 5.

Modeled estimates of differences in disease activity between an anti-inflammatory diet (intervention) and a diet nutritionally similar to a typical Swedish diet (control) for 10 wk among patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the randomized crossover ADIRA (Anti-inflammatory Diet in Rheumatoid Arthritis) trial1

Intervention Control Difference between periods2 95% CIs P
DAS28-ESR3
 Mean change (95% CIs) −0.369 (−0.628, −0.111) −0.080 (−0.335, 0.174) −0.289 −0.652, 0.075 0.116
Tender joints,4 %
 No tender joints at end of period 33.2 (16.1, 56.2) 27.1 (12.7, 48.7) 6.1 −15.2, 27.3 0.572
Swollen joints,4 %
 No swollen joints at end of period 48.6 (23.8, 74.1) 37.3 (16.2, 64.5) 11.4 −14.4, 37.2 0.383
ESR3,5
 Mean change (95% CIs) −0.051 (−0.347, 0.245) 0.210 (−0.081, 0.501) −0.261 −0.661, 0.138 0.194
VAS-GH,3, 5 mm
 Mean change (95% CIs) −0.219 (−0.742, 0.303) 0.099 (−0.415, 0.613) −0.319 −0.991, 0.354 0.343
DAS28-CRP3
 Mean change (95% CIs) −0.455 (−0.698, −0.212) −0.222 (−0.461, 0.017) −0.233 −0.569, 0.103 0.169
1

Participants completing ≥1 diet period (n = 47). CRP, C-reactive protein; DAS28, Disease Activity Score-28; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; VAS-GH, visual analog scale for general health.

2

Intervention minus control, post-period values.

3

Analyzed by use of a linear mixed model with period, treatment, sequence, and baseline value as fixed effects and subject as random effect.

4

Analyzed by use of a generalized linear mixed model with period, treatment, sequence, baseline value, and dietary quality as fixed effects, subject as random effect, and the outcome variable dichotomous as 0 = no tender/swollen joints, 1 = ≥1 tender/swollen joint.

5

Variable transformed with the square-root function for normal distribution before analysis. The values presented are the transformed values.