Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 3;6:20. doi: 10.1186/s40729-020-00217-7

Table 5.

Characteristics of studies included in this review

Author (year) Study design/follow-up (years)a Patients Age (mean±SD/range) Region Status Type of prosthesis No. of implants
Overall
FISP/RISP (no. of implants per patient)
Palmqvist et al. 1996 [29] PS (not randomized)/4,9 n = 30 NRb Maxilla Fully edentulous

15 FISP

15 RISP

Overall: 60

FISP: NRb

RISP: NRb

Cune et al. 1996 [30] RS/1 n = 74

55.1 ± 12.1

18.5–83.1

Maxilla

Mandible

Fully edentulous

10 FISP

50 RISP

Overall: 235

FISP: NRb

RISP: NRb

Makkonen et al. 1997 [32] PS (not randomized)/5 n = 33 39–75 Mandible Fully edentulous

13 FISP

20 RISP

Overall: 155

FISP: 5-6

RISP: 4

Tinsley et al. 2001 [33] PS (randomized)/5 n = 48 37–80 Mandible Fully edentulous

21 FISP

27 RISP

Overall: 181

FISP: 5

RISP: 2-3

Raghoebar et al. 2003 [34] PS (not randomized)/3 n = 40

56

30–70

Mandible Fully edentulous

10 FISP

30 RISP

Overall: 170

FISP: 5

RISP: 4

Quirynen et al. 2004 [31] PS (not randomized)/10 n = 37

59.3

36–85

Mandible Fully edentulous

12 FISP

25 RISP

NRb

aPS: prospective study, RS: retrospective study

bNR: not reported