Skip to main content
. 2020 May 27;11:926. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00926

Table 2.

Characteristics and findings of customer engagement studies.

Study and subtype Purpose Method Main findings Definition and components
(Abdul-Ghani et al., 2018); consumer Apply to specific area + stakeholder perspective Qual. Conceptual framework with engagement cycle in C2C contexts New; cognitive, affective, self-image, motivation
(Bowden, 2014); customer Analyze concept Discuss literature Conceptual framework with antecedents and consequences New (process)
(Brodie et al., 2011); customer Analyze concept Discuss literature + qual. New conceptualization and fundamental propositions New; cognitive, emotional, behavioral
(Dhanesh, 2017); customer Analyze concept Discuss literature Need for broader definition; importance of certain (new) aspects New; affective, cognitive, behavioral
(Graffigna and Gambetti, 2015); consumer brand Analyze concept Qual. Identify concepts and process as experienced by customers New (process); cognitive, affective, behavioral
(Hollebeek, 2011); customer brand Analyze concept + new conceptualization Discuss literature + qual. New definition and key themes (immersion, passion and activation) New; cognitive, emotional, behavioral
(Hollebeek et al., 2014); consumer brand Evaluate concept + develop and validate scale Qual. + quant. Confirm concept; antecedents and consequences; scale validation Existing; cognitive processing, affection, activation
(Kulta and Karjaluoto, 2016); mobile customer Analyze concept in specific area Systematic review Two different conceptualizations (behavioral activity or holistic) New; behavior, cognition, emotion
(Mittler et al., 2013); consumer Apply to specific area + propose framework Systematic review + case Conceptual framework to classify engagement programs New; activation, engaged behaviors
(Solem and Pedersen, 2016); Customer brand Analyze concept + develop and test scale Discuss literature + quant. Components confirmed; antecedents and consequences New; physical, emotional, cognitive
(Tan and Apisit-Isariyah, 2018); brand community Analyze concept + develop model Discuss literature + qual. Typology and model with characteristics, antecedents and consequences Unclear; cognitive, affective, behavioral, agentic/emphatic, para-social
(Yoshida et al., 2014); fan Analyze concept in specific area + validate new scale Quant. Components confirmed; antecedents and consequences New; management cooperation, individual participation, performance tolerance