. 2020 May 27;11:762. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00762

TABLE 4.

Fit measures and chi-square difference tests of the nested models in the Multi-Group Analyses (young versus old) for the Netherlands and Poland.

	*Chi-2 (df)*	*Comparison*	*ΔChi-2 (df)*	*NFI*	*CFI*	*RMSEA*
THE NETHERLANDS
M1 fully constrained invariant model^a	364.583* (150)			0.876	0.917	0.040
M2 partially invariant^b	326.647* (133)	M1-M2	37.936* (17)	0.890	0.927	0.039
M3 fully non-invariant model^c	325.523* (130)	M2-M3	1.124 (3)	0.877	0.919	0.039
		M1-M3	39.06* (20)
POLAND
M1 fully constrained invariant model^a	442.574* (148)			0.907	0.934	0.039
M2 partially invariant model^d	414.643* (131)	M1-M2	27.931* (17)	0.912	0.936	0.040
M3 non-invariant model^c	413.405* (128)	M2-M3	1.238 (3)	0.913	0.936	0.041
		M1-M3	29.142 (20)

*p < 0.05. ^aAll hypothesized and additional paths were specified as invariant for both young and old. ^bAll hypothesized and additional paths were set free for both young and old. The path between psychological support and job satisfaction T0 and the paths between opportunities for development and institutional commitment T0 and T1 were specified as invariant. ^cAll hypothesized and additional paths were set free for both young and old. ^dAll hypothesized and additional paths were set free for both young and old. The paths between psychological support and job satisfaction/institutional commitment T0 and the path between influence at work and job satisfaction T1 specified as invariant.