Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 27;41(7):1806–1818. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24913

Table 3.

Positive correlations of functional connectivity of seed regions from the “probabilistic in vivo atlas” of Pauli et al. under levodopa, compared with amisulpride (amisulpride vs. l‐DOPA)

Seed region Brain region Cluster size MNI‐coordinates pFDR
x y z
l‐DOPA > Amisulpride
Pu Gyrus Fusiformis R, hippocampus R, gyrus parahippocampalis R 205 32 –20 –24 0.005
NAC Gyrus temporalis inferior L, lateral occipital cortex L 228 −58 –64 –12 0.002
EXA Gyrus frontalis medius R 126 40 +26 +44 0.04
SNc Cerebellum R 366 18 –48 –50 0.0002
SNr Gyrus supramarginalis R, 644 64 –34 +44 0.000001
Cerebellum R 522 12 –46 –62 0.000004
Gyrus supramarginalis L, gyrus postcentralis L 364 −48 –40 +50 0.00008
Cerebellum L 286 −20 –66 –58 0.0004
Lateral occipital cortex L 195 −22 –72 +38 0.003
Amisulpride > l‐DOPA
EXA Cuneus L, Polus occipitalis L 334 −14 –78 +20 0.00007

Note: The table shows significant cluster, their size in voxel, and their localization in the MNI space as MNI coordination in the order x y z. The threshold for clusters was set at p < .001. Only significant seed regions are shown.

Abbreviations: Pu, putamen; CA, nucleus caudatus, NAC, nucleus accumbens; EXA, extended amygdala; SNc, substantia nigra pars compacta; SNr, substantia nigra pars reticularis; VTA, area tegmentalis ventralis; L, left; R, right.