Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 9;41(4):1061–1071. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24860

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Group‐level time‐frequency representation and scalp distribution of the power changes for the constraining relative to the nonconstraining condition, broken down by cTBS condition. T‐values for the comparison between time‐resolved spectra are shown for five representative channels. The location of each time‐resolved spectra corresponds roughly to the location of the respective channel. For sham cTBS, the significant cluster is shown averaged over the channels belonging to the cluster (i.e., all 32 channels assessed); data points not pertaining to the cluster are masked. Scalp topographies are shown for the averages between 8 and 24 Hz and −700 and −100 ms