Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 18;41(1):256–269. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24790

Table 2.

Rs‐fMRI studies reporting aberrant rs‐fMRI connectivity in presymptomatic Huntington's disease individuals compared to healthy controls

Reference Presymptomatic Huntington's disease Healthy controls Main findings Analysis
Sample (% F) Age (y ± SD) Education (y ± SD) Sample (% F) Age (y ± SD) Education (y ± SD)
Visual network
Poudel et al., 2014 25 (64%) 43 ± 9 Na 18 (78%) 46 ± 14 Na No differences ICA
Odish et al., 2015 22 (55%) 43 ± 9 4 ± 3a 18 (61%) 47 ± 7 4 ± 3a No differences ICA
Coppen et al., 2018 21 (48%) 37 ± 9 17 ± 3 18 (61%) 46 ± 11 17 ± 2 No differences Network of interest
Dumas et al., 2013 28 (61%) 43 ± 8 2–5a 28 (54%) 49 ± 9 2–5a Decreased FC Network of interest
Sensory‐motor network
Poudel et al., 2014 25 (64%) 43 ± 9 Na 18 (78%) 46 ± 14 Na Decreased FC ICA
Unschuld et al., 2012 10 (40%) 44 ± 9 Na 10 (60%) 42 ± 11 Na Decreased FC Seed
Koenig et al., 2014 Low 16 (94%) 33 ± 9 14 ± 2 16 (75%) 43 ± 9 16 ± 2 Increased FC Seed
Medium 16 (69%) 40 ± 10 15 ± 3 No differences
High 16 (88%) 48 ± 13 14 ± 2 Decreased FC
Odish et al., 2015 22 (55%) 43 ± 9 4 ± 3a 18 (61%) 47 ± 7 4 ± 3a No differences ICA
Dumas et al., 2013 28 (61%) 43 ± 8 2–5a 28 (54%) 49 ± 9 2–5a No differences Network of interest
Gorges et al., 2017 12 (75%) 36 (27–62) 14 (9–17) 22 (32%) 45 (25–51) 17 (12–19) No differences Seed
Cerebellum network
Poudel et al., 2014 25 (64%) 43 ± 9 Na 18 (78%) 46 ± 14 Na No differences ICA
Auditory network
Odish et al., 2015 22 (55%) 43 ± 9 4 ± 3a 18 (61%) 47 ± 7 4 ± 3a No differences ICA
Poudel et al., 2014 25 (64%) 43 ± 9 Na 18 (78%) 46 ± 14 Na No differences ICA
Dumas et al., 2013 28 (61%) 43 ± 8 2–5a 28 (54%) 49 ± 9 2–5a No differences Network of interest
Executive network
Odish et al., 2015 22 (55%) 43 ± 9 4 ± 3a 18 (61%) 47 ± 7 4 ± 3a No differences ICA
Poudel et al., 2014 25 (64%) 43 ± 9 Na 18 (78%) 46 ± 14 Na No differences ICA
Dumas et al., 2013 28 (61%) 43 ± 8 2–5a 28 (54%) 49 ± 9 2–5a No differences Network of interest
Frontoparietal network
Odish et al., 2015 22 (55%) 43 ± 9 4 ± 3a 18 (61%) 47 ± 7 4 ± 3a No differences ICA
Dumas et al., 2013 28 (61%) 43 ± 8 2–5a 28 (54%) 49 ± 9 2–5a No differences Network of interest
Poudel et al., 2014 25 (64%) 43 ± 9 Na 18 (78%) 46 ± 14 Na No differences ICA
Dorsal attention network
Dumas et al., 2013 28 (61%) 43 ± 8 2–5a 28 (54%) 49 ± 9 2–5a No differences Network of interest
Poudel et al., 2014 25 (64%) 43 ± 9 Na 18 (78%) 46 ± 14 Na Decreased FC ICA
Default mode network
Dumas et al., 2013 28 (61%) 43 ± 8 2–5a 28 (54%) 49 ± 9 2–5a No differences Network of interest
Odish et al., 2015 22 (55%) 43 ± 9 4 ± 3a 18 (61%) 47 ± 7 4 ± 3a No differences ICA
Poudel et al., 2014 25 (64%) 43 ± 9 Na 18 (78%) 46 ± 14 Na No differences ICA
Seibert et al., 2012 34 (59%) 41 ± 10 Na 22 (68%) 40 ± 12 Na No differences Seed
Salience network
Mason et al., 2018 19 (Na) 46 ± 12 Na 21 (Na) 42 ± 12 Na Reduced coupling activity mainly between SN and other sensory and cognitive networks Network of interest
Subcortical network
Gorges et al., 2017 12 (75%) 36 (27–62) 14 (9–17) 22 (32%) 45 (25–51) 17 (12–19) No differences Seed
Seibert et al., 2012 34 (59%) 41 ± 10 Na 22 (68%) 40 ± 12 Na No differences Seed
Regional properties and graph measures
Gargouri et al., 2016 24 (Na) 39 ± 9 Na 18 (50%) 44 ± 10 Na Decreasing hub organization in associative and SMN networks Graph measures
Harrington et al., 2015 Low 16 (94%) 33 ± 9 14 ± 2 16 (75%) 43 ± 9 16 ± 2 No differences Graph measures
Medium 16 (69%) 39 ± 10 15 ± 3 Weakened connections within ventral attention centers and frontal areas
High 16 (88%) 47 ± 13 14 ± 2 Weakened connections within frontostriatal network and stronger in ventral attention and parietal areas
McColgan, Gregory, et al., 2017 64 (45%) 44 ± 8 Na 66 (67%) 46 ± 8 Na Increase connectivity in anterior/frontal and decreased in posterior Graph measures
McColgan, Razi, et al., 2017 92 (47%) 42 ± 10 Na 94 (60%) 48 ± 11 Na Greater connectivity within parietal‐DMN regions Graph measures
Sarappa et al., 2017 11 (55%) 38 ± 7 Na 40 (55%) 37 ± 14 Na Decreased precuneus ALFF ALFF
Sarappa et al., 2017 11 (55%) 38 ± 7 Na 40 (55%) 37 ± 14 Na Decreased cerebellum and subcortical and increased frontotemporal ReHo ReHo

Abbreviations: ALFF, amplitude of low frequency fluctuations; F, female; FC, functional connectivity; Na, not available; PCC, posterior cingulate cortex; ReHo, regional homogeneity; SD; standard deviation; Y, years.

a

International Standard Classification of Education.