Table 1.

Clusters that showed increased or decreased activations in the 2‐back condition compared with the 1‐back condition in the block designed runs

p (cluster FDR)	Voxels	Coordinates			Peak T	Label
		x	y	z
<.001	2,108	24	11	56	11.65	Right middle frontal gyrus
		−24	8	50	10.72	Left middle frontal gyrus
		−48	5	32	9.810	Left precentral gyrus
<.001	2,897	−6	−61	44	10.73	Precuneus
		−18	−70	50	10.68	Left superior parietal lobule
		21	−67	53	10.44	Right superior parietal lobule
.004	120	48	5	23	7.00	Right precentral gyrus
.003	149	27	−61	−37	6.92	Right cerebellum
		9	−73	−31	4.78	Right cerebellum
.003	136	−18	5	11	5.84	Left caudate
		−30	26	2	5.75	Left anterior insula
.038	63	−33	50	2	4.20	Left middle frontal gyrus
		−42	50	2	4.02	Left middle frontal gyrus
<.001	661	−3	−16	32	−8.73	Middle cingulate gyrus
		0	−37	20	−6.08	Posterior cingulate gyrus
		0	−28	44	−5.42	Posterior cingulate gyrus
<.001	660	39	−19	20	−6.54	Right parietal operculum
		36	−16	2	−5.56	Right posterior insula
		39	2	−1	−5.16	Right anterior insula
<.001	910	12	59	20	−6.11	Superior frontal gyrus
		−6	62	8	−5.86	Medial superior frontal gyrus
		−9	53	−1	−5.84	Medial superior frontal gyrus
<.001	498	−36	−10	−4	−5.39	Left posterior insula
		−63	−25	5	−4.73	Left superior temporal gyrus
		−39	−19	17	−4.64	Left central operculum
.037	74	21	38	−1	−5.19	Anterior cingulate gyrus

Notes. The cluster was defined as two‐tailed p < .001, with cluster‐level false discovery rate (FDR) of p < .05. x, y, and z coordinates are in (Montreal Neurological Institute) MNI space.