Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 3;41(9):2281–2291. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24945

Table 2.

Regions showing decreased nodal centrality during jet lag

Label Brain regions Nodal efficiency Nodal degree Nodal betweenness
Jet lag 50‐day follow‐up p value Jet lag 50‐day follow‐up p value Jet lag 50‐day follow‐up p value
41 OrG_L_6_1 0.221 ± 0.029 0.240 ± 0.022 .001a 21.294 ± 9.233 26.596 ± 7.956 .010 61.393 ± 44.700 63.014 ± 38.710 .889
42 OrG_R_6_1 0.219 ± 0.026 0.241 ± 0.026 <.001a 20.246 ± 8.174 27.275 ± 9.230 .002 47.185 ± 27.747 76.144 ± 46.505 .009
154 PCun_R_4_4 0.218 ± 0.027 0.235 ± 0.022 .002a 19.813 ± 7.91 24.151 ± 8.164 .018 58.646 ± 67.12 60.704 ± 37.520 .887
175 CG_L_7_1 0.212 ± 0.030 0.231 ± 0.021 .003a 18.296 ± 9.245 22.926 ± 7.563 .029 46.020 ± 28.185 44.113 ± 25.309 .790
187 CG_L_7_7 0.216 ± 0.027 0.234 ± 0.021 .003a 18.891 ± 8.340 23.813 ± 7.682 .020 58.665 ± 49.251 57.649 ± 26.061 .930
219 BG_L_6_1 0.162 ± 0.039 0.196 ± 0.029 <.001a 7.195 ± 5.80 12.246 ± 7.052 <.001a 24.950 ± 26.354 36.097 ± 35.914 .210
220 BG_R_6_1 0.187 ± 0.039 0.214 ± 0.028 <.001a 12.564 ± 8.063 17.471 ± 8.190 .007 62.414 ± 30.630 69.332 ± 54.013 .627
223 BG_L_6_3 0.229 ± 0.032 0.254 ± 0.024 <.001a 24.543 ± 10.434 32.036 ± 9.236 .003 139.697 ± 116.065 147.999 ± 89.882 .815
224 BG_R_6_3 0.216 ± 0.033 0.244 ± 0.023 <.001a 20.046 ± 10.071 28.159 ± 8.598 <.001a 83.659 ± 61.547 104.561 ± 81.922 .328
225 BG_L_6_4 0.204 ± 0.039 0.228 ± 0.023 .001a 17.308 ± 9.202 22.721 ± 7.285 .008 61.489 ± 46.082 45.750 ± 47.584 .143
228 BG_R_6_5 0.139 ± 0.037 0.163 ± 0.035 .001a 4.530 ± 2.708 6.372 ± 4.57 .046 14.812 ± 14.994 21.379 ± 30.991 .224
231 Tha_L_8_1 0.194 ± 0.042 0.225 ± 0.037 <.001a 15.663 ± 8.437 22.712 ± 11.130 .005 106.175 ± 89.236 92.129 ± 58.135 .447
232 Tha_R_8_1 0.197 ± 0.042 0.229 ± 0.033 <.001a 15.663 ± 8.494 24.240 ± 11.4832 <.001a 83.633 ± 45.792 101.844 ± 49.082 .140
233 Tha_L_8_2 0.208 ± 0.042 0.232 ± 0.033 .002a 19.700 ± 9.935 24.798 ± 11.189 .017 79.31 ± 64.403 62.086 ± 47.976 .263
234 Tha_R_8_2 0.213 ± 0.046 0.239 ± 0.037 .001a 21.167 ± 11.775 27.526 ± 11.995 .004 76.790 ± 57.133 78.097 ± 68.352 .928
237 Tha_L_8_4 0.162 ± 0.037 0.192 ± 0.035 <.001a 8.193 ± 5.219 12.663 ± 8.151 .001 46.178 ± 64.288 38.057 ± 40.461 .545
238 Tha_R_8_4 0.173 ± 0.037 0.209 ± 0.036 <.001a 10.393 ± 6.729 17.621 ± 9.844 <.001a 43.934 ± 38.764 62.7870 ± 36.994 .142
243 Tha_L_8_7 0.148 ± 0.041 0.174 ± 0.044 .002a 6.321 ± 5.910 9.584 ± 7.329 .006 17.438 ± 26.929 16.267 ± 19.150 .866
245 Tha_L_8_8 0.215 ± 0.046 0.246 ± 0.039 <.001a 22.069 ± 12.217 30.459 ± 13.014 <.001a 107.774 ± 82.645 127.857 ± 100.285 .369
246 Tha_R_8_8 0.211 ± 0.045 0.244 ± 0.042 <.001a 20.905 ± 11.548 30.069 ± 13.429 .001a 111.001 ± 83.631 116.026 ± 64.589 .802

Note: Data are means ± standard deviations unless otherwise indicated. Regions were considered to have regional changes in the participants during jet lag if they exhibited significant between jet lag and recovery difference (p < .05, false discovery rate corrected) in at least one of the three nodal centralities.

Abbreviations: OrG, orbital gyrus; Pcun, precuneus; CG, cingulate gyrus; BG, basal ganglia; Tha, thalamus.

a

Corrected for multiple comparisons using FDR procedure.