Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 1;20:259. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01548-4

Table 3.

Correlation of echocardiographic and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging measures of right ventricular function

Mean ± SD (n) Correlation with
corresponding CMR parameter,
r-value
Correlation with
RVEFCMR,
r-value
CMR
 RVEF (%) 42 ± 14 (55)
 AVPDlat (mm) 14 ± 4 (54) 0.736***
 S’CMR (cm/s) 8.8 ± 3.0 (55) 0.472***
 FACCMR (%) 35 ± 13 (55) 0.819***
 FWSCMR (%) −20.1 ± 7.7 (55) 0.726***
Echocardiography
 TAPSE (mm) 19 ± 6 (53) 0.644*** 0.592***
 S’echo (cm/s) 11.3 ± 3.5 (53) 0.599*** 0.385**
 FACecho (%) 30 ± 14 (55) 0.808*** 0.681***
 FWSecho (%) −15.7 ± 4.8 (55) 0.656*** 0.778***

Data is presented as mean ± SD. For correlation between the methods, Pearson’s correlation coefficients were used. Significant correlation is present when: **: p < .01, ***: p < 0.001. CMR Cardiac magnetic resonance, RVEF Right ventricular ejection fraction derived from CMR, AVPDlat Lateral atrio-ventricular plane displacement, S’ S’-wave velocity, FAC Fractional area change, FWS Right ventricular free wall strain, TAPSE Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion