Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 3;20:848. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08986-x

Table 4.

Qualitative interview participant characteristics

Care-givers
 Participant ID Age Relationship with patient Education Home location Marital status Occupation Sex of patient
 CGFP01 31–50 Mother No formal education Rural Married Homemaker Female
 CGFP02 31–50 Mother Primary education Rural Married Homemaker Female
 CGMP01 31–50 Mother No formal education Rural Married Homemaker Male
 CGMP02 18–30 Wife Secondary education Rural Married Homemaker Male
Patients, cured and on treatment
 Participant ID Age Sex Education Home location Marital status Occupation
 CPF01 18–30 Female Secondary education Rural Widow Unemployed
 CPF02 18–30 Female Higher secondary education Urban Unmarried Student
 CPM01 18–30 Male Higher secondary education Urban Married Small business
 CPM02 31–50 Male Higher secondary education Rural Married Small business
 TBPF01 18–30 Female Secondary education Urban Married Factory worker
 TBPF02 18–30 Female Primary education Rural Married Home-maker
 TBPF03 18–30 Female Primary education Urban Married Home-maker
 TBPF04 51 plus Female Secondary education Rural Married Home-maker
 TBPM01 18–30 Male Primary education Rural Married Garment worker
 TBPM02 18–30 Male No education Rural Unmarried Garment worker
 TBPM03 31–50 Male Secondary education Urban Married Small-business
 TBPM04 18–30 Male Unknown Rural Married Unemployed
Health Professionals
 Participant ID Age Sex Education Occupation
 DR01 31–50 Male MBBS Doctor
 DR02 31–50 Male MBBS Doctor
 N01 31–50 Female Diploma in Nursing Nurse
 N02 31–50 Female Diploma in Nursing Nurse
Policy Makers
 Participant ID Age Sex Education Occupation
 PM01 60 Male MBBS, MPhil Government senior official/academic
 PM02 55 Male MBBS, MCPS, FCPS, MD, FCCP Government senior official
 PM03 45 Female MBBS, MPH Government senor official