Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 1;20:62. doi: 10.1186/s12862-020-01625-4

Table 1.

Comparison between fuxianhuiid species sorted by maximum length in ascending order

Taxon Locality/Age Min. length (mm) Max. length (mm) Reference
Xiaocaris luoensis nov. Chengjiang Stage 3 N/A 20.5 This study
Fuxianhuia xiaoshibaensis Xiaoshiba Stage 3 28 32 [5, 51]
Chengjiangocaris kunmingensis Xiaoshiba Stage 3 17 63 [5, 59]
Liangwangshania biloba Chengjiang Stage 3 45 66.6 [54]
Shankouia zhenghei Chengjiang Stage 3 50 75 [47]
Fuxianhuia protensa Chengjiang Stage 3 12 80 [21, 31]
Guangweicaris spinatus Guanshan Stage 4 60 95 [52, 53]
Chengjiangocaris longiformis Chengjiang Stage 3 N/A ca. 100 [21, 47]
Alacaris mirabilis Xiaoshiba Stage 3 60 120 [51, 60]