Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 17;157(4):985–993. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.11.032

Table 4.

Reasons Why Received Nodule Evaluation Deviated From Guideline Recommendations

Variable Any Deviation From Guideline-Recommended Care (n = 48) Less Intense Actual Care (n = 22) More Intense Actual Care (n = 26)
Referring/outside provider preference 2 0 2
Multidisciplinary team recommendation 32 8 24
Insurance related 0 0 0
Short-term loss of follow-up 3 3 0
Could not be determineda 11 11 0

Counts will not add up to total sample because some individuals will have multiple documented reasons for guideline non-adherent care.

a

We could not discern reason behind less intense care in patients who did not undergo recommended studies and were lost to follow-up from the multidisciplinary clinic but were known to be alive through other interactions with the health-care system.