Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 17;157(4):985–993. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.11.032

Table 5.

Diagnostic Test Utilization Associated With the Intensity of Received Lung Nodule Evaluation

Variable Less Intense (n = 22)
Guideline-Concordant (n = 65)
More Intense (n = 26)
No. of Patients % (95% CI) No. of Patients % (95% CI) No. of Patients % (95% CI)
No. of imaging tests
 0 7 32 (15-55) 18 28 (18-40) 4 15 (5.5-36)
 1 10 46 (25-67) 35 54 (41-66) 2 7.7 (1.8-28)
 2 3 14 (4.05-37) 5 7.7 (3.2-18) 6 23 (10-44)
 3 1 4.6 (0.5-30) 2 3.1 (0.7-12) 9 35 (18-56)
 ≥ 4 1 4.6 (0.5-30) 5 7.7 (3.2-18) 5 19 (7.7-40)
Any invasive procedure 0 0 (0-15) 37 57 (44-69) 10a 39 (21-59)
a

Of the 10 patients with more intense nodule evaluation who underwent an invasive procedure, the testing that resulted in more intense evaluation included shorter-than-recommended interval for imaging (n = 6), > 2 years of surveillance (n = 1), and bronchoscopy (n = 3).