Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 1;20:487. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05346-8

Table 2.

Results of Meta-analysis of systolic blood pressure

Study | SMD [95% Conf. Interval] % Weight
Carter (1997) [8] | -0.173 − 0.723 0.377 10.66
Carter (2009) [15] | -0.596 −0.796 − 0.396 16.73
Schumacher (2018) | -0.696 −0.927 −0.465 16.26
Korcegez (2017) | -0.574 −0.899 − 0.250 14.65
Domingues (2017) [40] | -0.301 −0.732 0.129 12.73
Javaid (2019) [42] | -1.456 −1.844 −1.067 13.49
Shao (2017) | -0.148 −0.426 0.131 15.47
D + L pooled RR | -0.573 −0.851 −0.295 100.00

Heterogeneity chi-squared = 33.52 (d.f. = 6) p = 0.000.

I-squared (variation in SMD attributable to heterogeneity) =82.1%.

Estimate of between-study variance Tau-squared = 0.1096.

Test of SMD = 0: z = 4.04 p = 0.000.

The significance level of the combined effect quantity test: 0.05.

The significance level of the heterogeneity test: 0.1.

Heterogeneity test: p > 0.1, no heterogeneity was considered; p < 0.1, heterogeneity was considered.