Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 1;20:487. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05346-8

Table 3.

Results of Meta-analysis of diastolic blood pressure

Study | SMD [95% Conf. Interval] % Weight
Carter (1997) [8] | 0.110 −0.439 0.660 8.55
Carter (2009) [15] | -0.108 −0.304 0.087 18.74
Schumacher (2018) | -0.654 −0.884 −0.424 17.58
Korcegez (2017) | -0.584 −0.908 −0.259 14.37
Domingues (2017) [40] | -0.285 −0.715 0.144 11.27
Javaid (2019) [42] | -0.402 −0.752 −0.052 13.57
Shao (2017) | -0.203 −0.482 0.075 15.91
D + L pooled SMD | -0.329 −0.532 −0.125 100.00

Heterogeneity chi-squared =18.35 (d.f. = 6) p = 0.005.

I-squared (variation in SMD attributable to heterogeneity) = 67.3%.

Estimate of between-study variance Tau-squared = 0.0476.

Test of SMD = 0: z = 3.17 p = 0.002.

The significance level of the combined effect quantity test: 0.05.

The significance level of the heterogeneity test: 0.1.

Heterogeneity test: p > 0.1, no heterogeneity was considered; p < 0.1, heterogeneity was considered.