Table 6.
1. Motor | ● More extensive occupational therapy is likely
beneficial ● Immunosuppression may help nerve recovery independent of anti-rejection effects ● Balancing muscle and tendon lengths is difficult but important ● Upper limbs are very helpful to lower limb rehabilitation |
2. Sensation | ● Discriminatory sensation is frequently
attainable ● Sensory recovery continues for years |
3. Cosmesis | ● Significant psychosocial benefit from being seen to have
hands ● Ensuring appropriate and similar length limbs is important |
4. Patient Satisfaction/quality of life | ● There is an exponential disability with bilateral versus
unilateral limb loss ● Setting realistic expectations is important ● Patients may have goals that are not obvious to the medical/surgical team (e.g. improved balance, temperature regulation, fitting clothing) |
5. Adverse events/complications | ● Complications are very common ● Hands are very susceptible to ischemia as they are “end organs” ● Patient selection is critical to minimize adverse outcomes ● Planning is essential to limit complications ● A well-trained medical/surgical team who work well together is enormously helpful ● Ischemia likely causes poor later function (contributes to muscle fibrosis) ● Always consider life over limb when deciding whether to proceed |
6. Financial costs | ● Financial costs of limb restoration are on par with other
complex medical/surgical interventions ● The cost of a disability may be much higher than that of direct medical care |
7. Overall function | ● Absolute scores on functional assessments are not as important as the change in score (i.e. more disabled patients stand to gain more from replantation/transplantation) |