Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 3;20:139. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01031-w

Table 4.

Proportion missed, workload savings, and estimated time savings for the dual independent screening simulations

Systematic review name Proportion missed, single reviewer, n (%) a Dual independent screening, fully automated simulation Dual independent screening, semi-automated simulation
Proportion missed, n (%) Workload savings, n (%) Time savings, hours (days) Proportion missed, n (%) Workload savings, n (%) Time savings, hours (days)
Biomarkers 1 (2) 0 (0) 1612 (47) 13 (2) 6 (13) 1109 (32) 9 (1)
Brain injury 2 (5) 0 (0) 6062 (48) 51 (6) 0 (0) 3936 (31) 33 (4)
Activity and pregnancy 11 (11) 1 (1) 2728 (47) 23 (3) 1 (1) 2409 (41) 20 (3)
Concussion 0 (0) 0 (0) 1239 (43) 10 (1) 0 (0) 601 (21) 5 (< 1)
Antipsychotics 4 (3) 2 (2) 11,956 (49) 100 (12) 3 (2) 9839 (40) 82 (10)
Digital technologies for pain 0 (0) 0 (0) 2462 (46) 21 (3) 0 (0) 2141 (40) 18 (2)
Treatments for bronchiolitis 10 (7) 1 (1) 5661 (48) 47 (6) 1 (1) 5005 (43) 42 (5)
VBAC 5 (24) 3 (14) 4892 (48) 41 (5) 3 (14) 3402 (33) 28 (4)
Visual acuity 0 (0) 0 (0) 11,029 (49) 92 (11) 0 (0) 7390 (33) 62 (8)
Experience of bronchiolitis 12 (43) 1 (1) 451 (35) 4 (< 1) 1 (1) 340 (26) 3 (< 1)
Experiences of UTIs 0 (0) 0 (0) 1293 (43) 11 (1) 0 (0) 447 (15) 4 (< 1)

UTI urinary tract infection; VBAC vaginal birth after caesarean section

aProportion missed (retrospective) had the screening been completed by the second reviewer in isolation