1 |
Efficient instead of effectiveness (reported twice) |
2 |
Patients included instead of enrolled |
3 |
Role of hydroxychloroquine should be efficacy and safety |
4 |
On respiratory viral load should be on nasopharyngeal viral load |
5 |
Single arm while later in the abstract it is comparative to negative control |
6 |
Patients included in a protocol instead of a study |
7 |
Negative control instead of standard of care control |
8 |
Early March to March 16th not precise. The study was approved on the 4th of March not clear when it started. |
9 |
Viral load was tested instead of was measured |
10 |
Hydroxychoroquine not specified on the top of standard of care |
11 |
Azithromycin appears as a new intervention not described in the methodology nor in the protocol. |
12 |
Untreated patients from another center should be from 4 other centers |
13 |
Presence of virus at day 6 was the primary end point while it was supposed to be at day 7 in the protocol and the protocol specify the objective is to measure time to clearance of virus load. |
14 |
While the study did not measure time to virus clearance it concluded at a reduction of carrying duration |
15 |
Survey instead of study |