Table 3. Linear mixed model results for the time differences in hoof-on and hoof-off detection.
Hoof-on time differences | |||||
predicted value (ms) | lower CI (ms) | upper CI (ms) | |||
Model 1: acceleration | walk | RF | 17.93 | 9.33 | 26.52 |
RH | 23.96 | 15.35 | 32.57 | ||
trot | RF | 13.77 | 5.20 | 22.34 | |
RH | 14.84 | 6.27 | 23.41 | ||
Model 2: angular velocity | walk | 11.06 | 4.13 | 17.99 | |
trot | 3.55 | -3.35 | 10.45 | ||
RF | 2.39 | -4.52 | 9.30 | ||
RH | 12.22 | 5.29 | 19.14 | ||
Hoof-off time differences | |||||
predicted value (ms) | lower CI (ms) | upper CI (ms) | |||
Model 3: acceleration | 3.20 | 0.05 | 6.34 | ||
Model 4: angular velocity | 0.75 | -3.83 | 5.32 |
The predicted values of the time difference between both algorithms relative to the force plate are determined in milliseconds (ms) and are deemed better if closer to zero. The 95% confidence interval was preferred to be small.