Table 2.
Preparedness | Confidence | Support | Access | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
N (%)* | N (%)* | N (%)* | N (%)* | ||
Discipline | Subjects allied to medicine | 23 (51.1%) | 24 (57.1%) | 23 (63.9%) | 34 (77.3%) |
Biological sciences | 10 (27.8%) | 15 (55.6%) | 23 (74.2%) | 26 (81.3%) | |
Physical sciences | 19 (59.4%) | 21 (65.6%) | 23 (74.2%) | 26 (81.3%) | |
Mathematical sciences | 11 (45.8%) | 13 (59.1%) | 15 (65.2%) | 17 (77.3%) | |
Computer science | 66 (66.0%) | 72 (75.8%) | 82 (86.3%) | 95 (94.1%) | |
Engineering and technology | 20 (67.1%) | 22 (68.8%) | 25 (80.6%) | 30 (83.3%) | |
Social science | 52 (42.6%) | 57 (51.4%) | 75 (67.0%) | 98 (80.3%) | |
Law | 16 (53.3%) | 17 (60.7%) | 19 (73.1%) | 22 (84.6%) | |
Business and administrative studies | 35 (44.9%) | 44 (58.7%) | 49 (77.8%) | 55 (76.4%) | |
Languages | 14 (30.4%) | 19 (48.7%) | 22 (53.7%) | 31 (73.8%) | |
Historical and philosophical studies | 22 (42.3%) | 25 (51.0%) | 35 (68.6%) | 41 (75.9%) | |
Creative arts and design | 26 (50.0%) | 30 (66.7%) | 25 (52.1%) | 41 (74.5%) | |
Education | 68 (64.2%) | 74 (72.5%) | 87 (85.3%) | 90 (84.9%) | |
Career Position | Lecturer (Assistant Professor) | 96 (44.4%) | 116 (58.6%) | 138 (72.3%) | 173 (80.1%) |
Senior Lecturer/Reader (Associate Professor) | 203 (50.9%) | 228 (62.0%) | 243 (69%) | 305 (79.6%) | |
Professor | 60 (46.2%) | 73 (58.9%) | 102 (79.7%) | 101 (83.5%) | |
Graduate Teaching Assistant/Fellow | – | – | 13 (72.2%) | 19 (95.0%) | |
Teaching Fellow | 23 (46.9%) | 26 (56.5%) | 29 (55.8%) | 44 (86.3%) | |
Academic related | 30 (73.2%) | 28 (71.8%) | 37 (92.5%) | 39 (88.6%) | |
Total | 451 (49.5%) | 516 (44.9%) | 606 (72.7%) | 727 (81.7%) |
Those in bold had a z score of + 1.96 meaning that this category were significantly more likely than expected to agree with the statement, those in italics has a z score of − 1.96 meaning that this category was significantly less likely than expected to agree with the statement. Cells with bellow 10 cases are not reported
*Number and percent of those who agreed with the statement, compared to those who disagreed with the statement