Skip to main content
. 2020 May 15;12(5):1824–1838.

Table 7.

Correlation of SOCS family members with debulk status of OC patients

Gene Debulk Case-low1 Case-high2 HR (95% CI) p-value
SOCS1 optimal 245 556 0.85 (0.68-1.05) 0.13
suboptimal 213 323 0.8 (0.65-0.98) 0.03*
SOCS2 optimal 60 183 1.34 (0.81-2.21) 0.26
suboptimal 117 118 1.52 (1.13-2.05) 0.0055**
SOCS3 optimal 112 131 1.73 (1.13-2.64) 0.01*
suboptimal 59 176 0.75 (0.54-1.05) 0.096
SOCS4 optimal 166 77 1.45 (0.95-2.21) 0.082
suboptimal 161 74 0.76 (0.55-1.06) 0.11
SOCS5 optimal 383 418 1.7 (1.38-2.09) 3.7e-07**
suboptimal 307 229 1.28 (1.05-1.57) 0.015*
SOCS6 optimal 172 71 0.4 (0.23-0.7) 0.001**
suboptimal 174 61 1.41 (1.01-1.95) 0.041*
SOCS7 optimal 170 73 1.17 (0.76-1.8) 0.47
suboptimal 170 65 1.58 (1.15-2.18) 0.0045**
CIS optimal 158 85 0.62 (0.4-0.96) 0.031*
suboptimal 116 119 1.38 (1.02-1.86) 0.0371*
1

Cases-low: patient number-low expression of the corresponding gene.

2

Cases-high: patient number-high expression of the corresponding gene.

*

P < 0.05;

**

P < 0.01.