Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 5;84(5):1460–1471. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01162-w

Table 3.

Correlation between SWASH and depth of hypnosis scores broken down by the type of screen and the length of delay

Group Measure
Composite Objective Subjective
Offline 0.76 [0.53, 0.89] 0.66 [0.37, 0.84] 0.77 [0.54, 0.89]
Online 0.70 [0.52, 0.83] 0.54 [0.29, 0.72] 0.81 [0.67, 0.89]
Difference 0.06 [− 0.21, 0.28] 0.12 [− 0.22, 0.43] − 0.04 [− 0.28, 0.15]
Short delay 0.79 [0.65, 0.88] 0.70 [0.51, 0.82] 0.83 [0.71, 0.90]
Long delay 0.55 [0.20, 0.78] 0.31 [− 0.10, 0.63] 0.70 [0.41, 0.86]
Difference 0.24 [− 0.03, 0.60] 0.38 [0.02, 0.81] 0.13 [− 0.07, 0.42]

The correlation values are all Pearson’s rs and the 95% CIs are reported within the squared brackets