Table 2.
Word overlap | Semantic similarity | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group | n | Error Rate, % | Shapiro–Wilk | p value | Semantic distance, pts | Shapiro–Wilk | p value |
Aggregate | |||||||
Total | 100 | 25% ± 12% | 0.93 | <0.001 | 1.20 ± 0.31 | 0.97 | 0.03 |
Speaker | |||||||
Patient | 100 | 25% ± 12% | 0.86 | <0.001 | 1.19 ± 0.33 | 0.94 | <0.001 |
Therapist | 100 | 26% ± 11% | 0.88 | <0.001 | 1.20 ± 0.29 | 0.99 | 0.57 |
Patient gender | |||||||
Male | 13 | 24% ± 9% | 0.95 | 0.55 | 1.17 ± 0.30 | 0.95 | 0.55 |
Female | 87 | 25% ± 13% | 0.84 | <0.001 | 1.19 ± 0.33 | 0.94 | <0.001 |
Plus/minus values denote standard deviation. Lower error rate is better. Lower semantic distance is better. Shapiro–Wilk tests were conducted to test the normality assumption (Supplementary Fig. 2). Low p values indicate the data are not normally distributed.