Skip to main content
. 2020 May 28;8:270. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00270

Table 2.

Studies comparing NIPPV and NCPAP.

References n Synchoniz-ation Surfactant prior GA, weeks Intubation/respiratory failure Death BPD
Armanian et al. (60) 98 No No <35 4 vs. 2 4 vs. 2 n/a
Bisceglia et al. (61) 88 No No 28–34 2 vs. 2 0 vs. 0 4 vs. 8
Kirplani et al. (62) 185 Some No <30 21 vs. 29 3 vs. 4 19 vs. 14
Meneses et al. (63) 200 No No 26–33 58 vs. 64 22 vs. 26 26 vs. 25
Kugelman et al. (64) 84 Yes No 24–34 25 vs. 46* 0 vs. 0 2 vs. 17*
Sai Sunil Kishore et al. (65) 76 No Some 28–34 19 vs. 41* 13 vs. 23 3 vs. 10
Salama et al. (66) 60 Yes Some 28–34 10 vs. 20 0 vs. 3 3 vs. 6
Lista et al. (67) 40 Yes Yes 28–34 10 vs. 15 0 vs. 0 0 vs. 0
Ramanathan et al. (68) 110 No Yes 26–29 17 vs. 42* 2 vs. 2 22 vs. 39
Oncel et al. (69) 200 No No 26–32 13 vs. 29* 4 vs. 6 7 vs. 16*

NIPPV, Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation; NCPAP, Nasal continuous positive pressure ventilation.

*

p < 0.05.