Table 3.
Detailed chart of patients who needed secondary surgery after closed reduction
| Case no. | Tenotomy (+/−) | IHDI grade | Preoperative AI | AVN grade | Type of secondary surgery |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | + | 2 | 41 | 0 | Dega osteotomy |
| 2 | + | 3 | 34 | 0 | Open reduction |
| 3 | + | 3 | 34 | 0 | Open reduction + Dega osteotomy |
| 4 | + | 2 | 39 | 0 | Salter osteotomy |
| 5 | + | 4 | 38 | 0 | Closed re-reduction |
| 6 | + | 2 | 36 | 0 | Dega osteotomy |
| 7 | + | 2 | 36 | 0 | Dega osteotomy |
| 8 | + | 2 | 43 | 1 | Dega osteotomy |
| 9 | + | 3 | 43 | 1 | Open reduction + Dega osteotomy |
| 10 | + | 4 | 41 | 0 | Open reduction + Dega osteotomy |
| 11 | + | 2 | 41 | 0 | Salter osteotomy |
| 12 | + | 4 | 35 | 0 | Open reduction + Dega osteotomy |
| 13 | + | 3 | 33 | 1 | Open reduction |
| 14 | – | 4 | 34 | 0 | Closed re-reduction |
| 15 | – | 3 | 31 | 0 | Open reduction + Salter osteotomy |
| 16 | – | 3 | 38 | 3 | Open reduction + Dega osteotomy |
| 17 | – | 3 | 39 | 3 | Open reduction + Dega osteotomy |
| 18 | – | 3 | 32 | 1 | Closed re-reduction |
| 19 | – | 4 | 30 | 0 | Open reduction |
| 20 | – | 4 | 32 | 1 | Closed re-reduction |
| 21 | – | 4 | 30 | 0 | Open reduction |
| 22 | – | 2 | 34 | 0 | Dega osteotomy |
| 23 | – | 4 | 41 | 0 | Open reduction + Dega&femoral osteotomy |
| 24 | – | 3 | 38 | 0 | Open reduction + Dega osteotomy |
Tenotomy (+) represents patients needed adductor tenotomy during the closed reduction and casting
These values measured just before the second surgery
AVN grade represent the evaluation of hip at the last control. Patients who undergone closed re-reduction surgery did not need tenotomy. Additionally, they were not go any further surgery such as open reduction or any bony procedure
IHDI International Hip Dysplasia Institute, AI Acetabular Index