Skip to main content
. 2020 May 28;11:366. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00366

Table 2.

Technical characteristics of the studies included in the R2* meta-analysis.

References Magnetic field MRI machine Method ROIs drew in No. echoes Voxel size
Ordidge et al. (22) 3 T Magnex Scientific Ltd. T2* T2* weighted 6 N/A
Graham et al. (9) 1.5 T Marconi Medical Systems R2* T2 weighted 6 0.9 × 0.9 × 2.5
Martin et al. (28) 3 T Magnex Scientific Ltd. R2* T2* weighted 6 2.3 × 2.3 × 5.0
Baudrexel et al. (32) 3 T Siemens T2* T1 map 8 1.0 × 1.0 × 2.0
Péran et al. (29) 3 T Siemens R2* T2* weighted 6 1.8 × 1.8 × 1.8
Focke et al. (37) 3 T Siemens R2* T1 MPRAGE + MT 5 1.7 × 1.7 × 1.7
Du et al. (20) 3 T Siemens R2* T2 weighted 6 1.0 × 1.0 × 1.0
Bunzeck et al. (33) 3 T Siemens R2* MT 6 1.0 × 1.0 × 1.0
Rossi et al. (23) 3 T Siemens R2* T2* map 5 0.6 × 0.6 × 4.0
Ulla et al. (13) 1.5 T Siemens R2* T2* weighted 6 2.2 × 2.2 × 2.5
Lewis et al. (38) 3 T Siemens R2* T2 weighted 6 1.0 × 1.0 × 1.0
Barbosa et al. (39) 3 T Philips R2* QSM 4 0.5 × 0.5 × 2.0
He et al. (31) 3 T GE R2* QSM 8 0.5 × 0.5 × 2.0
Murakami et al. (40) 3 T GE R2* R2* map 11 1.5 × 2.5 × 1.5
Pyatigorskaya et al. (8) 3 T Siemens R2* T2 weighted 6 2.0 × 2.0 × 2.0
Reimão et al. (26) 3 T Philips T2* Spin-echo T1 neuromelanin sensitive 7 1.2 × 0.9 × 4.0
Wieler et al. (41) 3 T Magnex Scientific Ltd. R2* T2* weighted 6 2.3 × 2.3 × 5.0
Guan et al. (30) 3 T GE R2* QSM 8 0.8 × 0.8 × 2.8
Hopes et al. (10) 3 T Philips R2* T2* weighted 15 2.0 × 2.0 × 2.0
Isaias et al. (12) 3 T Philips R2* T2* weighted 2 1 × 1 × 1
Langkammer et al. (42) 3 T Siemens R2* QSM 6 0.9 × 0.9 × 2.0
Du et al. (21) 3 T Siemens R2* T2 weighted 8 0.9 × 0.9 × 2.0
Langley et al. (13) 3 T Siemens R2* T2* weighted 6 0.5 × 0.5 × 1
Pesch et al. (16) 3 T Philips R2* 3D T1 weighted N/A 1.5 × 1.5 × 1.5
Ghassaban et al. (44) 3 T GE R2* QSM N/A 0.86 × 0.86 × 1
Arribarat et al. (11) 3 T Siemens R2* T2 weighted 6 1.8 × 1.8 × 1.8
Li et al. (14) 3 T Siemens R2* QSM 8 0.63 × 0.63 × 2.0