Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 2;54(4):495–503. doi: 10.1007/s43465-020-00053-2

Table 6.

Bone and Functional result comparison with other studies in literature

S. no. Name of study Number of patients Excellent result (%) Good result (%) Fair/poor result (%)
Bone results Functional results Bone results Functional results Bone results Functional results
1. Harshwal et al. [19] 37 65 73 24 16 11 11
2. Ajmera et al. [20] 30 76 84 12 8 12 8
3. Patil [18] 54 67 80 25 13 8 7
4. Mudiganty [22] 40 57.5 32.5 40 65 2.5 2.5
5. Rohilla et al. [7] (6 cm and less bone gap monolateral fixator group) 24 50 75 45.8 20.8 4.2 4.2
6. Rohilla et al. [7] (> 6 cm bone gap monolateral fixator group) 11 18.18 36.36 36.36 45.45 45.46 18.19
7. Present study group I (6 cm and less bone gap) 20 70 75 25 20 5 5
8. Present study group II (> 6 cm bone gap) 15 26 33.34 40 53.34 33 13.32